mirrors/passt
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

passt: Add the README

Browse source 
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Stefano Brivio 2021-03-18 12:56:03 +01:00
parent ef25cb39a9
commit 00f3bcea05
1 changed files with 177 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

177
README.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
# passt: Plug A Simple Socket Transport
_passt_ implements a translation layer between a Layer-2 network interface (tap)
and native Layer-4 sockets (TCP, UDP, ICMP/ICMPv6 echo) on a host. It doesn't
require any capabilities or privileges, and it can be used as a simple
replacement for Slirp.
- [General idea](#general-idea)
- [Non-functional Targets](#non-functional-targets)
- [Interfaces and Environment](#interfaces-and-environment)
- [Services](#services)
- [Addresses](#addresses)
- [Protocols](#protocols)
- [Ports](#ports)
- [Try it](#try-it)
- [Contribute](#contribute)
## General idea
When container workloads are moved to virtual machines, the network traffic is
typically forwarded by interfaces operating at data link level. Some components
in the containers ecosystem (such as _service meshes_), however, expect
applications to run locally, with visible sockets and processes, for the
purposes of socket redirection, monitoring, port mapping.
To solve this issue, user mode networking as provided e.g. by _Slirp_,
_libslirp_, _slirp4netns_ can be used. However, these existing solutions
implement a full TCP/IP stack, replaying traffic on sockets that are local to
the pod of the service mesh. This creates the illusion of application processes
running on the same host, eventually separated by user namespaces.
While being almost transparent to the service mesh infrastructure, that kind of
solution comes with a number of downsides:
* three different TCP/IP stacks (guest, adaptation and host) need to be
traversed for every service request. There are no chances to implement
zero-copy mechanisms, and the amount of context switches increases
dramatically
* addressing needs to be coordinated to create the pretense of consistent
addresses and routes between guest and host environments. This typically needs
a NAT with masquerading, or some form of packet bridging
* the traffic seen by the service mesh and observable externally is a distant
replica of the packets forwarded to and from the guest environment:
* TCP congestion windows and network buffering mechanisms in general operate
differently from what would be naturally expected by the application
* protocols carrying addressing information might pose additional challenges,
as the applications don't see the same set of addresses and routes as they
would if deployed with regular containers
_passt_ implements a thinner layer between guest and host, that only implements
what's strictly needed to pretend processes are running locally. A further, full
TCP/IP stack is not necessarily needed. Some sort of TCP adaptation is needed,
however, as this layer runs without the `CAP\_NET\_RAW` capability: we can't
create raw IP sockets on the pod, and therefore need to map packets at Layer-2
to Layer-4 sockets offered by the host kernel.
The problem and this approach are illustrated in more detail, with diagrams,
[here](https://gitlab.com/abologna/kubevirt-and-kvm/-/blob/master/Networking.md).
## Non-functional Targets
Security and maintainability goals:
* no dynamic memory allocation
* ~2 000 LoC target
* no external dependencies
## Interfaces and Environment
_passt_ exchanges packets with _qemu_ via UNIX domain socket, using the `socket`
back-end in qemu. Currently, qemu can only connect to a listening process via
TCP. Two temporary solutions are available:
* a [patch](https://passt.top/passt/tree/qemu) for qemu
* a wrapper, [qrap](https://passt.top/passt/tree/qrap.c), that connects to a
UNIX domain socket and starts qemu, which can now use the file descriptor
that's already opened
This approach, compared to using a _tap_ device, doesn't require any security
capabilities, as we don't need to create any interface.
## Services
_passt_ provides some minimalistic implementations of networking services that
can't practically run on the host:
* [ARP proxy](https://passt.top/passt/tree/arp.c), that resolve the address of
the host (which is used as gateway) to the original MAC address of the host
* [DHCP server](https://passt.top/passt/tree/dhcp.c), a simple implementation
handing out one single IPv4 address to the guest, namely, the same address as
the first one configured for the upstream host interface, and passing the
nameservers configured on the host
* [NDP proxy](https://passt.top/passt/tree/ndp.c), which can also assign prefix
and nameserver using SLAAC
* _to be done_: DHCPv6 server: right now, the guest gets the same _prefix_ as
the host, but not the same address, because the suffix is generated from the
MAC address of the virtual machine, so we currently have to translate packet
addresses back and forth. With a DHCPv6 server, we could simply assign the
host address to the guest
## Addresses
For IPv4, the guest is assigned, via DHCP, the same address as the upstream
interface of the host, and the same default gateway as the default gateway of
the host. Addresses are never translated.
For IPv6, the guest is assigned, via SLAAC, the same prefix as the upstream
interface of the host, and the same default route as the default route of the
host. This means that the guest will typically have a different address, and
the destination address is translated for packets going to the guest. This will
be avoided in the future once a minimalistic DHCPv6 server is implemented in
_passt_.
## Protocols
_passt_ supports TCP, UDP and ICMP/ICMPv6 echo (requests and replies). More
details about the TCP implementation are available
[here](https://passt.top/passt/tree/tcp.c), and for the UDP
implementation [here](https://passt.top/passt/tree/udp.c).
An IGMP proxy is currently work in progress.
## Ports
To avoid the need for explicit port mapping configuration, _passt_ binds to all
unbound non-ephemeral (0-49152) TCP ports and all unbound (0-65536) UDP ports.
Binding to low ports (0-1023) will fail without additional capabilities, and
ports already bound (service proxies, etc.) will also not be used.
Service proxies and other services running in the container need to be started
before _passt_ starts.
## Try it
* build from source:
git clone https://passt.top/passt
cd passt
make
* a static build for x86_64 as of the latest commit is also available for
convenience [here](https://passt.top/builds/static/). These binaries are
simply built with:
CFLAGS="-static" make
* run the demo script, that creates a network namespace called `passt`, sets up
sets up a _veth_ pair and and addresses, together with NAT for IPv4 and NDP
proxying for IPv6, then starts _passt_ in the network namespace:
doc/demo.sh
* from the same network namespace, start qemu. At the moment, qemu doesn't
support UNIX domain sockets for the `socket` back-end. Two alternatives:
* use the _qrap_ wrapper, which maps a tap socket descriptor to _passt_'s
UNIX domain socket, for example:
ip netns exec passt ./qrap 5 qemu-system-x86_64 ... -net socket,fd=5 -net nic,model=virtio ...
* or patch qemu with [this patch](https://passt.top/passt/tree/qemu/0001-net-Allow-also-UNIX-domain-sockets-to-be-used-as-net.patch)
and start it like this:
qemu-system-x86_64 ... -net socket,connect=/tmp/passt.socket -net nic,model=virtio
* and that's it, you should now have TCP connections, UDP, and ICMP/ICMPv6
echo working from/to the guest for IPv4 and IPv6
* to connect to a service on the VM, just connect to the same port directly
with the address of the network namespace. For example, to ssh to the guest,
from the main namespace on the host:
ssh 192.0.2.2
## Contribute
Send patches and issue reports to [sbrivio@redhat.com](mailto:sbrivio@redhat.com).