cppcheck: Work around bug in cppcheck 2.12.0
cppcheck 2.12.0 (and maybe some other versions) things this if condition is always true, which is demonstrably not true. Work around the bug for now. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8640d62af7
commit
117b474f85
1 changed files with 7 additions and 0 deletions
7
tcp.c
7
tcp.c
|
@ -1553,6 +1553,13 @@ static int tcp_update_seqack_wnd(const struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn,
|
|||
|
||||
conn->wnd_to_tap = MIN(new_wnd_to_tap >> conn->ws_to_tap, USHRT_MAX);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Certain cppcheck versions, e.g. 2.12.0 have a bug where they think
|
||||
* the MIN() above restricts conn->wnd_to_tap to be zero. That's
|
||||
* clearly incorrect, but until the bug is fixed, work around it.
|
||||
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2240705
|
||||
* https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/discussion/general/thread/f5b1a00646/
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/* cppcheck-suppress [knownConditionTrueFalse, unmatchedSuppression] */
|
||||
if (!conn->wnd_to_tap)
|
||||
conn_flag(c, conn, ACK_TO_TAP_DUE);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue