udp: rename udp_sock_handler() to udp_buf_sock_handler()

We are going to introduce a variant of the function to use
vhost-user buffers rather than passt internal buffers.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Laurent Vivier 2024-06-13 14:36:52 +02:00 committed by Stefano Brivio
parent e7ac995217
commit 377b666dc9
3 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View file

@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ loop:
tcp_timer_handler(&c, ref);
break;
case EPOLL_TYPE_UDP:
udp_sock_handler(&c, ref, eventmask, &now);
udp_buf_sock_handler(&c, ref, eventmask, &now);
break;
case EPOLL_TYPE_PING:
icmp_sock_handler(&c, ref);

6
udp.c
View file

@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static void udp_tap_send(const struct ctx *c,
}
/**
* udp_sock_handler() - Handle new data from socket
* udp_buf_sock_handler() - Handle new data from socket
* @c: Execution context
* @ref: epoll reference
* @events: epoll events bitmap
@ -736,8 +736,8 @@ static void udp_tap_send(const struct ctx *c,
*
* #syscalls recvmmsg
*/
void udp_sock_handler(const struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref, uint32_t events,
const struct timespec *now)
void udp_buf_sock_handler(const struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref, uint32_t events,
const struct timespec *now)
{
/* For not entirely clear reasons (data locality?) pasta gets
* better throughput if we receive tap datagrams one at a

2
udp.h
View file

@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
#define UDP_TIMER_INTERVAL 1000 /* ms */
void udp_portmap_clear(void);
void udp_sock_handler(const struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref, uint32_t events,
void udp_buf_sock_handler(const struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref, uint32_t events,
const struct timespec *now);
int udp_tap_handler(struct ctx *c, uint8_t pif, sa_family_t af,
const void *saddr, const void *daddr,