doc: Trivial fix for reuseaddr-priority
This test program checks for particular behaviour regardless of order of
operations. So, we step through the test with all possible orders for
a number of different of parts. Or at least, we're supposed to, a copy
pasta error led to using the same order for two things which should be
independent.
Fixes: 299c407501
("doc: Add program to document and test assumptions about SO_REUSEADDR")
Reported-by: David Taylor <davidt@yadt.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ec2691a12e
commit
8bd57bf25b
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static void check_all_orders(void)
|
||||||
for (k = 0; k < norders; k++)
|
for (k = 0; k < norders; k++)
|
||||||
for (l = 0; l < norders; l++)
|
for (l = 0; l < norders; l++)
|
||||||
check_one_order(orders[i], orders[j],
|
check_one_order(orders[i], orders[j],
|
||||||
orders[j], orders[l]);
|
orders[k], orders[l]);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
|
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue