We verify that every packet we store in a pool (and every partial packet
we retreive from it) has a length no longer than UINT16_MAX. This
originated in the older packet pool implementation which stored packet
lengths in a uint16_t. Now, that packets are represented by a struct
iovec with its size_t length, this check serves only as a sanity / security
check that we don't have some wildly out of range length due to a bug
elsewhere.
We have may reasons to (slightly) increase this limit in future, so in
preparation, give this quantity an explicit name - PACKET_MAX_LEN.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Fundamentally what packet_check_range() does is to check whether a given
memory range is within the allowed / expected memory set aside for packets
from a particular pool. That range could represent a whole packet (from
packet_add_do()) or part of a packet (from packet_get_do()), but it doesn't
really matter which.
However, we pass the start of the range as two parameters: @start which is
the start of the packet, and @offset which is the offset within the packet
of the range we're interested in. We never use these separately, only as
(start + offset). Simplify the interface of packet_check_range() and
vu_packet_check_range() to directly take the start of the relevant range.
This will allow some additional future improvements.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Currently we have a dummy pkt[1] array, which we alias with an array of
a different size via various macros. However, we already require C11 which
includes flexible array members, so we can do better.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
add virtio and vhost-user functions to connect with QEMU.
$ ./passt --vhost-user
and
# qemu-system-x86_64 ... -m 4G \
-object memory-backend-memfd,id=memfd0,share=on,size=4G \
-numa node,memdev=memfd0 \
-chardev socket,id=chr0,path=/tmp/passt_1.socket \
-netdev vhost-user,id=netdev0,chardev=chr0 \
-device virtio-net,mac=9a:2b:2c:2d:2e:2f,netdev=netdev0 \
...
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
[sbrivio: as suggested by lvivier, include <netinet/if_ether.h>
before including <linux/if_ether.h> as C libraries such as musl
__UAPI_DEF_ETHHDR in <netinet/if_ether.h> if they already have
a definition of struct ethhdr]
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To be able to manage buffers inside a shared memory provided
by a VM via a vhost-user interface, we cannot rely on the fact
that buffers are located in a pre-defined memory area and use
a base address and a 32bit offset to address them.
We need a 64bit address, so replace struct desc by struct iovec
and update range checking.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
A classic gotcha of the standard C library is that its unwise to call any
variable 'index' because it will shadow the standard string library
function index(3). This can cause warnings from cppcheck amongst others,
and it also means that if the variable is removed you tend to get confusing
type errors (or sometimes nothing at all) instead of a nice simple "name is
not defined" error.
Strictly speaking this only occurs if <string.h> is included, but that
is so common that as a rule it's best to just avoid it always. We
have a number of places which hit this trap, so rename variables and
parameters to avoid it.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
In practical terms, passt doesn't benefit from the additional
protection offered by the AGPL over the GPL, because it's not
suitable to be executed over a computer network.
Further, restricting the distribution under the version 3 of the GPL
wouldn't provide any practical advantage either, as long as the passt
codebase is concerned, and might cause unnecessary compatibility
dilemmas.
Change licensing terms to the GNU General Public License Version 2,
or any later version, with written permission from all current and
past contributors, namely: myself, David Gibson, Laine Stump, Andrea
Bolognani, Paul Holzinger, Richard W.M. Jones, Chris Kuhn, Florian
Weimer, Giuseppe Scrivano, Stefan Hajnoczi, and Vasiliy Ulyanov.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
If the first packet_get() call doesn't assign len, the second one
will also return NULL, but gcc doesn't see this.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Implement a packet abstraction providing boundary and size checks
based on packet descriptors: packets stored in a buffer can be queued
into a pool (without storage of its own), and data can be retrieved
referring to an index in the pool, specifying offset and length.
Checks ensure data is not read outside the boundaries of buffer and
descriptors, and that packets added to a pool are within the buffer
range with valid offset and indices.
This implies a wider rework: usage of the "queueing" part of the
abstraction mostly affects tap_handler_{passt,pasta}() functions and
their callees, while the "fetching" part affects all the guest or tap
facing implementations: TCP, UDP, ICMP, ARP, NDP, DHCP and DHCPv6
handlers.
Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>