clang-tidy, starting from LLVM version 16, up to at least LLVM version
19, now checks that we detect and handle errors for snprintf() as
requested by CERT C rule ERR33-C. These warnings were logged with LLVM
version 19.1.2 (at least Debian and Fedora match):
/home/sbrivio/passt/arch.c:43:3: error: the value returned by this function should not be disregarded; neglecting it may lead to errors [cert-err33-c,-warnings-as-errors]
43 | snprintf(new_path, PATH_MAX + sizeof(".avx2"), "%s.avx2", exe);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/sbrivio/passt/arch.c:43:3: note: cast the expression to void to silence this warning
/home/sbrivio/passt/conf.c:577:4: error: the value returned by this function should not be disregarded; neglecting it may lead to errors [cert-err33-c,-warnings-as-errors]
577 | snprintf(netns, PATH_MAX, "/proc/%ld/ns/net", pidval);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/sbrivio/passt/conf.c:577:4: note: cast the expression to void to silence this warning
/home/sbrivio/passt/conf.c:579:5: error: the value returned by this function should not be disregarded; neglecting it may lead to errors [cert-err33-c,-warnings-as-errors]
579 | snprintf(userns, PATH_MAX, "/proc/%ld/ns/user",
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
580 | pidval);
| ~~~~~~~
/home/sbrivio/passt/conf.c:579:5: note: cast the expression to void to silence this warning
/home/sbrivio/passt/pasta.c:105:2: error: the value returned by this function should not be disregarded; neglecting it may lead to errors [cert-err33-c,-warnings-as-errors]
105 | snprintf(ns, PATH_MAX, "/proc/%i/ns/net", pasta_child_pid);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/sbrivio/passt/pasta.c:105:2: note: cast the expression to void to silence this warning
/home/sbrivio/passt/pasta.c:242:2: error: the value returned by this function should not be disregarded; neglecting it may lead to errors [cert-err33-c,-warnings-as-errors]
242 | snprintf(uidmap, BUFSIZ, "0 %u 1", uid);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/sbrivio/passt/pasta.c:242:2: note: cast the expression to void to silence this warning
/home/sbrivio/passt/pasta.c:243:2: error: the value returned by this function should not be disregarded; neglecting it may lead to errors [cert-err33-c,-warnings-as-errors]
243 | snprintf(gidmap, BUFSIZ, "0 %u 1", gid);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/sbrivio/passt/pasta.c:243:2: note: cast the expression to void to silence this warning
/home/sbrivio/passt/tap.c:1155:4: error: the value returned by this function should not be disregarded; neglecting it may lead to errors [cert-err33-c,-warnings-as-errors]
1155 | snprintf(path, UNIX_PATH_MAX - 1, UNIX_SOCK_PATH, i);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/sbrivio/passt/tap.c:1155:4: note: cast the expression to void to silence this warning
Don't silence the warnings as they might actually have some merit. Add
an snprintf_check() function, instead, checking that we're not
truncating messages while printing to buffers, and terminate if the
check fails.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
perror() prints directly to standard error, but in many cases standard
error might be already closed, or we might want to skip logging, based
on configuration. Our logging functions provide all that.
While at it, make errors more descriptive, replacing some of the
existing basic perror-style messages.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Sufficiently recent cppcheck (I'm using 2.13.0) seems to have added another
warning for pointer variables which could be pointer to const but aren't.
Use this to make a bunch of variables const pointers where they previously
weren't for no particular reason.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
In practical terms, passt doesn't benefit from the additional
protection offered by the AGPL over the GPL, because it's not
suitable to be executed over a computer network.
Further, restricting the distribution under the version 3 of the GPL
wouldn't provide any practical advantage either, as long as the passt
codebase is concerned, and might cause unnecessary compatibility
dilemmas.
Change licensing terms to the GNU General Public License Version 2,
or any later version, with written permission from all current and
past contributors, namely: myself, David Gibson, Laine Stump, Andrea
Bolognani, Paul Holzinger, Richard W.M. Jones, Chris Kuhn, Florian
Weimer, Giuseppe Scrivano, Stefan Hajnoczi, and Vasiliy Ulyanov.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Minor style improvement suggested by cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
...instead of argv[0], which might or might not contain a valid path
to the executable itself. Instead of mangling argv[0], use the same
link to find out if we're already running the AVX2 build where
supported.
Alternatively, we could use execvpe(), but that might result in
running a different installed version, in case e.g. the set of
binaries is present in both /usr/bin and /usr/local/bin, with both
being in $PATH.
Reported-by: Wenli Quan <wquan@redhat.com>
Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101310
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Reported by Coverity: if we fail to run the AVX2 version, once
execve() fails, we had already replaced argv[0] with the new
stack-allocated path string, and that's then passed back to
main(). Use a static variable instead.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Build-time selection of AVX2 flags and routines is not practical for
distributions, but limiting AVX2 usage to checksum routines with
specific run-time detection doesn't allow for easy performance gains
from auto-vectorisation of batched packet handling routines.
For x86_64, build non-AVX2 and AVX2 binaries, and implement a simple
wrapper replacing the current executable with the AVX2 build if it's
available, and if AVX2 is supported by the current CPU.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
