For the policy to work as expected across either AppArmor commit
9d3f8c6cc05d ("parser: fix parsing of source as mount point for
propagation type flags") and commit 300889c3a4b7 ("parser: fix option
flag processing for single conditional rules"), we need one mount
rule with matching mount options as "source" (that is, without
source), and one without mount options and an explicit, empty source.
Link: https://github.com/containers/buildah/issues/5440
Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221840
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
The spec file patch by Dan Čermák was originally contributed at:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/passt/pull-request/1
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Partially equivalent to commit abf5ef6c22 ("apparmor: Allow pasta
to remount /proc, access entries under its own copy"): we should
allow pasta to remount /proc. It still works otherwise, but further
UID remapping in nested user namespaces (e.g. pasta in pasta) won't.
Reported-by: Laurent Jacquot <jk@lutty.net>
Link: https://bugs.passt.top/show_bug.cgi?id=79#c3
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
This reverts commit 3fb3f0f7a5: it was
meant as a patch for Fedora 37 (and no later versions), not something
I should have merged upstream.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
If passt is started with --fd to talk over a pre-opened UNIX domain
socket, we don't really know what label might be associated to it,
but at least for an unconfined_t socket, this bit of policy wouldn't
belong to anywhere else: enable that here.
This is rather loose, of course, but on the other hand passt will
sandbox itself into an empty filesystem, so we're not really adding
much to the attack surface except for what --fd is supposed to do.
Reported-by: Matej Hrica <mhrica@redhat.com>
Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247221
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
With current selinux-policy-37.22-1.fc37.noarch, and presumably any
future update for Fedora 37, the user_namespace class is not
available, so statements using it prevent the policy from being
loaded.
If a class is not defined in the base policy, any related permission
is assumed to be enabled, so we can safely drop those.
Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237996
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
The hard link trick didn't actually fix the issue with SELinux file
contexts properly: as opposed to symbolic links, SELinux now
correctly associates types to the labels that are set -- except that
those labels are now shared, so we can end up (depending on how
rpm(8) extracts the archives) with /usr/bin/passt having a
pasta_exec_t context.
This got rather confusing as running restorecon(8) seemed to fix up
labels -- but that's simply toggling between passt_exec_t and
pasta_exec_t for both links, because each invocation will just "fix"
the file with the mismatching context.
Replace the hard links with two separate builds of the binary, as
suggested by David. The build is reproducible, so we pass "-pasta" in
the VERSION for pasta's build. This is wasteful but better than the
alternative.
Just copying the binary over would otherwise cause issues with
debuginfo packages due to duplicate Build-IDs -- and rpmbuild(8) also
warns about them.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
If pasta and pasta.avx2 are hard links to passt and passt.avx2,
AppArmor will attach their own profiles on execution, and we can
restrict passt's profile to what it actually needs. Note that pasta
needs to access all the resources that passt needs, so the pasta
abstraction still includes passt's one.
I plan to push the adaptation required for the Debian package in
commit 5bb812e79143 ("debian/rules: Override pasta symbolic links
with hard links"), on Salsa. If other distributions need to support
AppArmor profiles they can follow a similar approach.
The profile itself will be installed, there, via dh_apparmor, in a
separate commit, b52557fedcb1 ("debian/rules: Install new pasta
profile using dh_apparmor").
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Since commit b0e450aa85 ("pasta: Detach mount namespace, (re)mount
procfs before spawning command"), we need to explicitly permit mount
of /proc, and access to entries under /proc/PID/net (after remount,
that's what AppArmor sees as path).
Fixes: b0e450aa85 ("pasta: Detach mount namespace, (re)mount procfs before spawning command")
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Starting with commit 770d1a4502 ("isolation: Initially Keep
CAP_SETFCAP if running as UID 0 in non-init"), the lack of this rule
became more apparent as pasta needs to access uid_map in procfs even
as non-root.
However, both passt and pasta needs this, in case they are started as
root, so add this directly to passt's abstraction (which is sourced
by pasta's profile too).
Fixes: 770d1a4502 ("isolation: Initially Keep CAP_SETFCAP if running as UID 0 in non-init")
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
As a result of AppArmor commit d4b0fef10a4a ("parser: fix rule flag
generation change_mount type rules"), we can't expect anymore to
get permission to mount() / read-write, with MS_REC | MS_UNBINDABLE
("runbindable", in AppArmor terms), if we don't explicitly pass those
flags as options. It used to work by mistake.
Now, the reasonable expectation would be that we could just change the
existing rule into:
mount options=(rw, runbindable) "" -> /,
...but this now fails to load too, I think as a result of AppArmor
commit 9d3f8c6cc05d ("parser: fix parsing of source as mount point
for propagation type flags"). It works with 'rw' alone, but
'runbindable' is indeed a propagation type flag.
Skip the source specification, it doesn't add anything meaningful to
the rule anyway.
Reported-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
Link: https://github.com/containers/podman/pull/19751
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
While abstractions/nameservice appeared too broad and overkill for
our simple need (read-only resolv.conf access), it properly deals
with symlinked resolv.conf files generated by systemd-resolved,
NetworkManager or suchlike.
If we just grant read-only access to /etc/resolv.conf, we'll fail to
read nameserver information in rather common configurations, because
AppArmor won't follow the symlink.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
...now it gets ugly. If we use pasta without an existing target
namespace, and run commands directly or spawn a shell, and keep
the pasta_t domain when we do, they won't be able to do much: a
shell might even start, but it's not going to be usable, or to
even display a prompt.
Ideally, pasta should behave like a shell when it spawns a command:
start as unconfined_t and automatically transition to whatever
domain is associated in the specific policy for that command. But
we can't run as unconfined_t, of course.
It would seem natural to switch to unconfined_t "just before", so
that the default transitions happen. But transitions can only happen
when we execvp(), and that's one single transition -- not two.
That is, this approach would work for:
pasta -- sh -c 'ip address show'
but not for:
pasta -- ip address show
If we configure a transition to unconfined_t when we run ip(8), we'll
really try to start that as unconfined_t -- but unconfined_t isn't
allowed as entrypoint for ip(8) itself, and execvp() will fail.
However, there aren't many different types of binaries pasta might
commonly run -- for example, we're unlikely to see pasta used to run
a mount(8) command.
Explicitly set up domain transition for common stuff -- switching to
unconfined_t for bin_t and shells works just fine, ip(8), ping(8),
arping(8) and similar need a different treatment.
While at it, allow commands we spawn to inherit resource limits and
signal masks, because that's what happens by default, and don't
require AT_SECURE sanitisation of the environment (because that
won't happen by default). Slightly unrelated: we also need to
explicitly allow pasta_t to use TTYs, not just PTYs, otherwise
we can't keep stdin and stdout open for shells.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
This is needed to monitor filesystem-bound namespaces and quit when
they're gone -- this feature never really worked with SELinux.
Fixes: 745a9ba428 ("pasta: By default, quit if filesystem-bound net namespace goes away")
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
That's what we actually need to check networking-related sysctls,
to scan for bound ports, and to manipulate bits of network
configuration inside pasta's target namespaces.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
Somehow most of this used to work on older kernels, but now we need
to explicitly permit setuid, setgid, and setcap capabilities, as well
as read-only access to passwd (as we support running under a given
login name) and sssd library facilities.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Kernel commit ed5d44d42c95 ("selinux: Implement userns_create hook")
seems to just introduce a new functionality, but given that SELinux
implements a form of mandatory access control, introducing the new
permission breaks any application (shipping with SELinux policies)
that needs to create user namespaces, such as passt and pasta for
sandboxing purposes.
Add the new 'allow' rules. They appear to be backward compatible,
kernel-wise, and the policy now requires the new 'user_namespace'
class to build, but that's something distributions already ship.
Reported-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
There's no reason to use wildcards, and we don't want any
similarly-named binary (not that I'm aware of any) to risk being
associated to passt_exec_t and pasta_exec_t by accident.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
The Makefile installs symbolic links by default, which actually
worked at some point (not by design) with SELinux, but at least on
recent kernel versions it doesn't anymore: override pasta (and
pasta.avx2) with hard links.
Otherwise, even if the links are labeled as pasta_exec_t, SELinux
will "resolve" them to passt_exec_t, and we'll have pasta running as
passt_t instead of pasta_t.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
In practical terms, passt doesn't benefit from the additional
protection offered by the AGPL over the GPL, because it's not
suitable to be executed over a computer network.
Further, restricting the distribution under the version 3 of the GPL
wouldn't provide any practical advantage either, as long as the passt
codebase is concerned, and might cause unnecessary compatibility
dilemmas.
Change licensing terms to the GNU General Public License Version 2,
or any later version, with written permission from all current and
past contributors, namely: myself, David Gibson, Laine Stump, Andrea
Bolognani, Paul Holzinger, Richard W.M. Jones, Chris Kuhn, Florian
Weimer, Giuseppe Scrivano, Stefan Hajnoczi, and Vasiliy Ulyanov.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
That was meant to be an example, and I just dropped it in the
previous commit -- passt.if should be more than enough as a possible
example.
Reported-by: Carl G. <carlg@fedoraproject.org>
Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182145
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
This was meant to be an example, but I managed to add syntax errors
to it. Drop it altogether.
Reported-by: Carl G. <carlg@fedoraproject.org>
Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182145
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Instead of:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux_Policy_Modules_Packaging_Draft
follow this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux_Independent_Policy
which seems to make more sense and fixes the issue that, on a fresh
install, without a reboot, the file contexts for the binaries are not
actually updated.
In detail:
- labels are refreshed using the selinux_relabel_pre and
selinux_relabel_post on install, upgrade, and uninstall
- use the selinux_modules_install and selinux_modules_uninstall
macros, instead of calling 'semodule' directly (no functional
changes in our case)
- require the -selinux package on SELinux-enabled environments and if
the current system policy is "targeted"
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
...and in any case, this patch doesn't offer any advantage over the
current upstream integration.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Native support was introduced with commit 13c6be96618c, QEMU 7.2.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Even libvirt itself will configure passt to write log, PID and socket
files to different locations depending on whether the domain is
started as root (/var/log/libvirt/...) or as a regular user
(/var/log/<PID>/libvirt/...), and user_tmp_t would only cover the
latter.
Create interfaces for log and PID files, so that callers can specify
different file contexts for those, and modify the interface for the
UNIX socket file to allow different paths as well.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Laine reports that with a simple:
<portForward proto='tcp'>
<range start='2022' to='22'/>
</portForward>
in libvirt's domain XML, passt won't start as it fails to bind
arbitrary ports. That was actually the intention behind passt_port_t:
the user or system administrator should have explicitly configured
allowed ports on a given machine. But it's probably not realistic, so
just allow any port to be bound and forwarded.
Also fix up some missing operations on sockets.
Reported-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Otherwise, it's unusable as stand-alone tool, or in foreground mode,
and it's also impossible to get output from --help or --version,
because for SELinux it's just a daemon.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>
One day, libvirt might actually support running passt to provide
guest connectivity. Should libvirtd (or virtqemud) start passt, it
will need to access socket and PID files in specific locations, and
passt needs to accept SIGTERM in case QEMU fails to start after passt
is already started.
To make this more convenient, split the current profile into two
abstractions, for passt and for pasta, so that external programmes
can include the bits they need (and especially not include the pasta
abstraction if they only need to start passt), plus whatever specific
adaptation is needed.
For stand-alone usage of passt and pasta, the 'passt' profile simply
includes both abstractions, plus rules to create and access PID and
capture files in default or reasonable ($HOME) locations.
Tested on Debian with libvirt 9.0.0 together with a local fix to start
passt as intended, namely libvirt commit c0efdbdb9f66 ("qemu_passt:
Avoid double daemonizing passt"). This is an example of how the
libvirtd profile (or virtqemud abstraction, or virtqemud profile) can
use this:
# support for passt network back-end
/usr/bin/passt Cx -> passt,
profile passt {
/usr/bin/passt r,
owner @{run}/user/[0-9]*/libvirt/qemu/run/passt/* rw,
signal (receive) set=("term") peer=/usr/sbin/libvirtd,
signal (receive) set=("term") peer=libvirtd,
include if exists <abstractions/passt>
}
translated:
- when executing /usr/bin/passt, switch to the subprofile "passt"
(not the "discrete", i.e. stand-alone profile), described below.
Scrub the environment (e.g. LD_PRELOAD is dropped)
- in the "passt" subprofile:
- allow reading the binary
- allow read and write access to PID and socket files
- make passt accept SIGTERM from /usr/sbin/libvirtd, and
libvirtd peer names
- include anything else that's needed by passt itself
Suggested-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Instead of restricting PID files to /var/run/passt.pid, which is a
single file and unlikely to be used, use the user_tmp_t type which
should cover any reasonable need.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Services running passt will commonly need to transition to its
domain, terminate it, connect and write to its socket.
The init_daemon_domain() macro now defines the default transition to
the passt_t domain, using the passt_exec_t type.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
This is an example interface, currently unused, so it went undetected:
m4 macros need a backtick at the beginning of a block instead of a
single quote.
Fixes: 1f4b7fa0d7 ("passt, pasta: Add examples of SELinux policy modules")
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
The development of the Debian package is now at:
https://salsa.debian.org/sbrivio/passt
Drop contrib/debian, it's finally obsolete.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
AppArmor resolves executable links before profile attachment rules
are evaluated, so, as long as pasta is installed as a link to passt,
there's no way to differentiate the two cases. Merge the two profiles
and leave a TODO note behind, explaining two possible ways forward.
Update the rules so that passt and pasta are actually usable, once
the profile is installed. Most required changes are related to
isolation and sandboxing features.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
fedora-review says:
Note: Directories without known owners:
/usr/share/selinux/packages/passt, /usr/share/doc/passt,
/usr/share/selinux, /usr/share/selinux/packages
and selinux-policy owns those two last ones.
While at it, split Requires: tags also for post and preun actions
onto different lines, for consistency.
Reported-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
fedora-review says:
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/selinux/packages/passt,
/usr/share/doc/passt
While at it, replace "passt" by "%{name}" in a few places for
consistency.
Reported-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
...instead of PATH. This seems to be the only change needed in
existing pasta integrations after patch:
Use explicit --netns option rather than multiplexing with PID
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
