6da2895cdf
...which makes it fall under MIT licensing terms. Daniel reports that it's very unusual for spec files to contain explicit licensing terms and might cause minor inconveniences later on, on mass changes to spec files. I originally added licensing information using SPDX identifiers to make the project fully compliant with the REUSE Specification 3.0 (https://reuse.software/spec/), but there are anyway a few more files not including explicit licensing information. It might be worth to fix that later on, in any case. Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| apparmor | ||
| debian | ||
| fedora | ||
| kata-containers | ||
| libvirt | ||
| podman | ||
| qemu | ||
| selinux | ||